March 13, 2026 | 10:14 am
Judges acquitted a JakTV news director of obstruction of justice charges. This ruling vindicates free speech and is a win for freedom of expression.
THE Corruption Court’s ruling to acquit JakTV News Director Tian Bahtiar of obstruction of justice charges in three corruption cases is a win for freedom of expression. This ruling proves that dissenting perspectives that spark opposing opinions fall outside the scope of criminalization.
The panel of judges delivered its decision during the proceedings for corruption in the crude palm oil (CPO), tin, and sugar industries last Tuesday and Wednesday. Prosecutors had demanded an eight-year imprisonment sentence and a Rp600 million fine, or an additional 150 days in prison, for Tian. They accused him of sabotaging the investigations and prosecutions by the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) by deploying “media operations” to build unfavorable narratives against them.
The judges correctly posited that, in essence, negative reporting is a matter of perception and viewpoints, both of which are recognized components of a functioning democracy. Furthermore, news reports carrying a negative tone are fundamentally different from false information or hoaxes.
We must also commend the court for citing Constitutional Court Decision No. 145/PUU-XXIII/2025, issued on March 2, 2026. This demonstrates how the panel upheld press freedom as a constitutional right that must be protected.
The Press Council had actually declared Tian’s work as a non-journalistic product due to its heavy marketing elements. It was also clear that JakTV’s broadcasts related to these cases were the result of a Rp478.5 million collaboration between the media company’s business team and its clients. Basically, these were advertisements wrapped in journalistic language.
Nevertheless, Tian’s work falls within the media industry ecosystem. It cannot be arbitrarily subjected to criminal charges. Moreover, the AGO had been wrong from the get-go when they bypassed the ethical assessment processes, such as coordinating with the Press Council, and opted to go straight for the legal route, criminalizing Tian. This oversight carries the risk of affirming the criminalization of freedom of expression and press independence.
While content created for the purpose of cultivating negative opinions and perceptions is generally harmful, it does not warrant criminalization. Such work should only be met with public condemnation and social sanctions. In many ways, social sanctions are often more severe than criminal penalties because they do not have an expiration date, unlike a fixed prison sentence.
The Attorney General’s Office and other law enforcement agencies should not feel obstructed by the formation of opposing opinions. If an opinion is deemed inaccurate, it should be countered with factual information, not intimidation or the criminal prosecution of its creator.
The tendency to settle disagreements through intimidation and criminalization is a dangerous practice. This is especially true when the law enforcement agency has flawed governance. In such an environment, the public could rightly assume that anyone who disagrees with the authorities could be imprisoned at any moment.
The Wrong Way to Tackle Disinformation
44 hari lalu
There is no need to continue with the anti-disinformation and foreign propaganda bill. Existing legislation is sufficient.
South Korea's 'Fake News' Law Tests Press Autonomy
44 hari lalu
Critics accuse lawmakers of pushing measures that could stifle a free press, while South Korean government says the changes are needed.
YLBHI: Indonesia's Proposed Disinformation Bill Could Target Critical Voices
56 hari lalu
YLBHI has stated that the government's preparation of the Bill on the Prevention of Disinformation and Foreign Propaganda is in contradiction to the constitution.
Komdigi's SAMAN System Raises Concerns Over Freedom of Expression
22 November 2025
Safenet Director said SAMAN was introduced earlier this year by the Komdigi Ministry as a derivative of the implementation of the ITE Law.
After a Year of Prabowo-Gibran, How Safe Is Freedom of Expression in Indonesia?
22 Oktober 2025
A Celios survey shows no improvement in Indonesia's freedom of expression under the first year of Prabowo administration. Here's the detail.
Indonesian Govt Dismisses Concerns of Journalist Criminalization in PDP Law
23 September 2025
Ministry of Communication and Digital Directorate General notes concern on PDP Law.
Human Rights Ministry Cites Freedom of Expression over Activist Hunger Strike
19 September 2025
Activist from Gejayan Memanggil movement, Syahdan Husein, goes on hunger strike in detention. The action will continue until all political detainees are released.
Setara Institute: Indonesian Military Cyber Patrols Risk Digital Repression
9 September 2025
Setara also criticizes the involvement of the TNI in securing demonstrations, both in the field and in the digital space.
LBH Jakarta Slams Prabowo's Remark on Permits for Protests
2 September 2025
LBH Jakarta evaluates that expressing opinions is the constitutional right of citizens. Therefore, they do not require permission as stated by Prabowo.
Why so Afraid of One Piece Flag
13 Agustus 2025
The government's overreaction to the hoisting of the One Piece flag only underscores its allergy to dissenting voices.
:strip_icc():format(jpeg)/kly-media-production/medias/5486410/original/015853500_1769586166-Pesib_Kurzawa.jpg)
